Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver??? posts

Yahoo Finance "Why have a 4,000-pound automobile that seats five to move one person a short distance at low speed?"
Why Uber's self-driving cars won't last, according to an expert at MIT
finance.yahoo.com
Uber recently rolled out a fleet of self-driving cars in Pittsburgh.
114 months ago
AP A friend remembers the first U.S. fatality in a wreck involving a car in self-driving mode. "He had the need for speed. Kind of a daredevil, loved the excitement."
Tesla driver killed while using Autopilot loved fast cars
bigstory.ap.org
CANTON, Ohio (AP) — Joshua Brown, the first U.S. fatality in a wreck involving a car in self-driving mode, had an adventurous streak with a "need for speed" but also was a brilliant innovator and beloved neighbor, say…
117 months ago
Ajay Sharma Respected Editor Prof. R Srinivasan, Current Science , Indian Institute of Science and Referee Prof. Sunil Mukhi, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research , Pune & TIFR Mumbai European Centre for Nuclear Research (CERN) contradicts Read more ... Einstein Relativity in TRILLON dollar experiments. Why scientists continue to ignore experimental results , to save face of Einstein. Has 127 billion Indians have no honors ? Are they intellectually orphans? Scientists have done all ( and keeping silent), I am simply interpreting results. Part I According to Newton, mass remains constant i.e. 5gm remains 5 gm only. In simple words Einstein’s Special Relativity states mass increases with velocity, 5 gm may become 500000 Kg or more. The condition is that when velocity of body is comparable to that of light ( 3x108 m/s). It is verified in number of ways , initially by Kauffman , Bucherer etc. in 1900-1910. So mass increase with velocity , it confirmed . Part II (i) European Centre for Nuclear Physics (CERN) data reveals in ATLAS, CMS experiments in 2012, that speed of proton was 299 789 760 m/s (99.9999991% the speed of light) . (ii) Original (rest ) mass of proton is 1.0072766 a.m.u . When it moves with this speed in LHC, then its mass must be 235 times more i.e. 236. 71 a.m.u.(according to Einstein) for analysis. But in calculations mass of fast moving (velocity 299 789 760 m/s ) proton is taken as 1.0072766 a.m.u . This is Soul of arguments. (iii) Why effective mass (increased when body moves) or relativistic mass , which is 236. 71 a.m.u. is not taken in account, in calculations ? Why it is taken 1.0072766 a.m.u ., which is mass at rest? In all other cases relativistic mass (increased with velocity) is taken, even it is an experimental weapon to verify Einsteins relativist mass. (iv) Everything is experimentally well measured in LHC at CERN, distance traveled 10 hours by a proton beam ~ 10 billion km (A round trip to Neptune) and Number of turns per second ring of proton 11 245. The speed was 299 789 760 m/s (99.9999991% the speed of light) . Thus relativistic mass is 236.71 a.m.u , not 1.0072766 a.m.u. Why it is ignored? (iv) Scientists are neglecting the issue as whole the Relativity will be proved wrong. Many concepts in nuclear physics will be re-written. Part III Few months back I sent paper to Editor Prof. R Srinivasan csc@ias.ernet.in ) Govt Funded journal Current Science , at Indian Institute of Science Banglore. He further sent it to Professor Sunil Mukhi ( sunil.mukhi@iiserpune.ac.in who is Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune & Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai) Under very dubious communication , Prof. Mukhi did not recommend the paper for publication . Absolutely no reason which part of paper is wrong. How it is wrong? Is he not clear what to say. ? Is it sheer injustice? If I am wrong tell me clearly, I will see reply . In spite of reminders (as in previous occasions) to Editor and Prof. Mukhi , none responded. They are again requested for the same. It is unfortunate. After this I wish to discuss various other (Newton’s Third Law, Einstein predicts OUTPUT is possible without INPUT. About paper (generalization of Newton’s Third Law of Motion), Prof. Srinivasan had written that it cannot be published as it challenges 311 years old Newton’s Third Law of motion.. Is honor of 127 billion Indians and scientific spirits is nothing is cipher. I have huge number of such starling reports to discuss, because you never respond. Yours faithfully Ajay Sharma Email ajoy.plus@gmail.com www.AjayOnLine.us 94184 50899
Beyond Newton, Einstein and Archimedes – Ajay Sharma | Whatsapp +9194184-50899
ajayonline.us
How and Why 2266 years old Archimedes, 331 years old Newton’s Laws and 111 years old Einstein’s E=mc2 is Generalized ? By Ajay Sharma February 9, 2016 0 Video 1, Newton did not discovered 2nd Law of Motion , Swis Read more ... s Euler did, 15 minutes. LINK : https://www.youtub...
117 months ago
Ajay Sharma Indian Institute of Science, Banglore is more closed than Mandir/Masjid/Church/Gurudwara / respectable religious places? We question at religious places. But no questioning allowed at IISc. Bangalore. Decisions are imposed, no body responds. No Read more ... one assumes responsibility. What is the secrecy of office when an official from Bangalore ( Ramesh Chandrika) writing scientific reports from Email ID (sunil.mukhi@iiserpune.ac.in ) of Prof. Sunil Mukhi of (Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune & Tata Institute of Fundamental Research , Mumbai ). Thus password and used name of official Email ID are public. Dear Editor Prof. R Srinivasan This note describes the poor state of fairs of evaluation of research papers of journal Current Science , Indian Institute of Science, Banglore . I have no way out , except bringing in notice of general public via internet rather suffocating myself. Even information is not given under Right to Information Act 2005, as there is no PIO here. Thus Current Science is above parliament and Mahamahim Rastrapati ji. In 2016 you sent me decision on well composed logical three papers. (i) Paper on Modification of 311 years old Newton’s Third Law of Motion. Action and Reaction are not always equal …..my generalization. The reasons are given. (a) The decision on the paper (Generalized form of Third Law of Motion) was sent by you. (Editor, Prof. R. Srinivasan csc@ias.ernet.in ) Reason : You have written in report …. we cannot challenge 311 years old Newton’s Third Law of Motion. Is India not independent, self dependent and sovereign country? Are we slave , and others are master controlling our thinking. Do you promote ONLY recycled research work in Govt. funded Journal CURRENT SCIENCE ( started by Nobel Laureate C V Raman in 1932) (ii) Then decision on two papers was sent. It was sent by Chandrika Ramesh for Editor Current Science, works at Banglore from Email Prof Sunil Mukhi of ( sunil.mukhi@iiserpune.ac.in who is Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune & Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai) . Is there no secrecy in office of GOVT. funded journal Current Science? Like this tomorrow someone from Pakistan will write from Email ID of Current Science or Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune . Part I Large Hadron Collider (LHC) experiment results proves relativity wrong. (i) In Relativity if body moves with speed comparable to light, then its mass increase. (ii) European Centre for Nuclear Physics (CERN) data reveals in ATLAS, CMS experiments in 2012, that speed of proton was 299 789 760 m/s (99.9999991% the speed of light) Original ( rest ) mass of proton is 1.0072766 a.m.u . When it moves with this speed in LHC , then its mass must be 235 times more i.e. 236. 71 a.m.u. The increase in mass is prediction of relativity. But in calculations mass of fast moving proton is taken as 1.0072766 a.m.u . So relativity is clearly contradicted in LHC experiment. Why scientists are silent. This experiment cost trillion dollars. (iii) Why scientists are silent over the issue? I took speed from CERN data. I interpreted it. How I am wrong? Why my paper is rejected? Prof. Sunil Mukhi did not respond neither to this paper not previous paper. Also Editor Current Science, Bangalore is silent. It happened earlier also. It is against interest of 7.29 crore Indians. So all should know what scientists can do in this system, hence shared publically. . Part II Correspondence with European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) , Geneva. (i) I wrote by Email and on face book of CERN stating that speed of proton at energy 6-7 TeV was calculated theoretically with mathematical formula. So the speed of proton must also be measured by experiments to finally confirm the Relativity. On 20th December 2015, CERN Communication Centre wrote on face book that experiments described by me are feasible … Face book paste ************* CERN Control Centre (CCC) In short: measuring the revolution frequency, knowing the path length, we can derive the actual velocity.********* Like • Reply • 5 hrs Link : https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1232053070145277&id=172354182781843&comment_id=1242809932402924&reply_comment_id=1243696178980966¬if_t=share_reply. Part III Working past 34 years since student of BSc. II (1982) Let me remind you I have published over 55 articles modifying Newton, Einstein and Archimedes in peer review journals, conference and science magazines. According to you all editors who published my work are foolish. Twice I presented my researches in USA (2006, 2014) , England ( 2005, 2008) , Germany, Russia, Taiwan , Ukraine etc. ALL my work is complied in two books Beyond Newton and Archimedes and Beyond Einstein and E=mc2. An early reply solicited along with detailed reports on the paper. Then other papers will be considered with scientific logic e.g. you have written that Einstein has OUTPUT is possible without INPUT……worry not law of conservation of energy. Is there anyone in 7.29 billions who agrees with you (Editor Current Science, Banglore India). Thanking you in anticipation. Yours faithfully Ajay Sharma Email ajoy.plus@gmail.com www.AjayOnLine.us , 0 94184 50899
117 months ago
Craig Boehman Photography My photoessay 'Mumbai from a balcony' http://www.digitaljournal.com/a-and-e/arts/op-ed-photo-essay-mumbai-from-a-balcony/article/450386
Photo essay: Mumbai from a balcony
digitaljournal.com
A street photographer at heart, I chastise myself when I don't get out enough in Mumbai to photograph its people and places. But with a new building going up within shouting distance of my balcony, I'm rediscovering India — from 10 stories high.
124 months ago
Craig Boehman Photography My photoessay 'Mumbai from a balcony' http://www.digitaljournal.com/a-and-e/arts/op-ed-photo-essay-mumbai-from-a-balcony/article/450386
Photo essay: Mumbai from a balcony
digitaljournal.com
A street photographer at heart, I chastise myself when I don't get out enough in Mumbai to photograph its people and places. But with a new building going up within shouting distance of my balcony, I'm rediscovering India — from 10 stories high.
124 months ago
Daily Mail Apalling
Dashcam shows white van man intimidating a learner DURING her test
dailym.ai
The driver can be seen driving up close behind the learner driver to try to force her to break the speed limit, honking his horn and shouting.
125 months ago
The Daily Beast You can thank this woman for those crazy wild driving stunts in the Fast and Furious movies. #Drivetastic Sponsored by Autotrader http://thebea.st/1JWnwb1
Her Need For Speed: The Secrets of The World’s Top Female Stunt Driver
thebea.st
In the driver’s seat with top female stunt driver Debbie Evans.
127 months ago
Jalopnik If you think a time-speed-distance rally is easy, think again. It's hard even in a crazy WRX-swapped Subaru of America, Inc. Forester.
Driving Public Roads At Legal Speeds Is The Hardest Thing I've Ever Done
blackflag.jalopnik.com
Time-speed-distance rallies seem simple enough: maintain a constant speed over a certain distance on open public roads, and stop every so often at checkpoints to prove you’re on time. Many consider it an introduction to stage rally. Introduction! H Read more ... a. Let me explain how this was the hardest thing eve…
129 months ago
Delicious
The long road to self-driving cars
www.engadget.com
Automakers are big on self-driving cars this year. Audi, fresh from breaking both the autonomous speed and distance records (and driving me around a trac
135 months ago
More Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver??? posts »

Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver??? news

No news about Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver???

Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver??? videos

No videos about Q: U r driving a car from Mumbai to Banglore . Car no is MH-12A-4185 . The distance is 400 km. The car moves at certain speed. It starts at 10.06 am and reaches banglore at 5.56pm. What is the Birthdate of the driver???

Related searches

Privacy policy | Terms of service | Contact us